Millennium
Project
Global Challenges Facing Humanity
4.
Democratization
How can genuine democracy emerge from
authoritarian regimes?
Elements of global governance such as ISOs, international treaties, multilateral
organizations, and self-organizing bodies on the Internet, along with the evolution
of business systems and ICT, are augmenting governments’ democratic emergence.
Although the perception and implementation of democracy differ globally, it
is generally accepted that democracy is a relationship between a responsible
citizenry and a responsive government that encourages participation in the political
process and guarantees basic rights. Since democracies tend not to fight each
other and since humanitarian crises are far more likely under authoritarian
regimes than democratic ones, the trend toward democracy should lead to a more
peaceful future. Aging populations are increasing and their countries tend to
maintain democratic gains more than countries with younger populations do. However,
democracy and freedom declined over the last two years in one-fifth of the world’s
countries, according to Freedom House. Four times as many countries showed declines
during 2007 as improved, and press freedom continued a six-year negative trend
across the world, with increased intimidation of journalists and increasing
control of media in the hands of a few in business or government.
The longer-term trend is positive: the number of free countries grew from 43
to 90 over the past 30 years, accounting for 46% of the world’s population.
Countries partly free expanded from 48 to 60, while 36% of the world population
today lives in 43 countries with authoritarian regimes. The movement from authoritarian
to more democratic regimes is being aided by the growth of civil society, media
access for pro-democratic actors, long-term economic stability, a focus on citizen
participation, transparent judicial systems, e-government with Internet access,
increasing literacy, improved quality of governance assessment systems, international
interdependence, and the development of a global consciousness. Democratic forces
will have to work harder to make sure that the short-term reversals do not stop
the longer-term trend of democratization.
International protocols are needed to assist failed states or regions within
states, and intervention procedures are needed when a state constitutes a significant
threat to its citizens or others. Although making development assistance dependent
on good governance has helped in some countries, genuine democracy will be achieved
when the people—not external actors—demand government accountability.
The ILO warns that workplace discrimination remains common around the world
and that, in spite of some progress on gender and race, discrimination based
on age, sexual orientation, and disability is increasing.
The Internet allows self-organization around common ideals, independent of
conventional institutional controls and regardless of nationality or languages.
Injustices in different parts of the world become the concern of thousands or
millions of people who then pressure local, regional, or international governing
systems to find solutions. This unparalleled social power is reinventing citizens’
roles in the political process and changing institutions, policymaking, and
governance. However, the development of methods to counter information manipulation,
as well as increased freedom of information transmission, will be important
for continued democratic consolidation. Organized crime, methods to tamper with
election results, information warfare, and the potential of individuals to make
and use weapons of mass destruction should be seriously addressed in order to
build a healthy global democracy.
Challenge 4 will be addressed seriously when strategies to address these threats
are in place, when less than 10% of the world lives in nondemocratic countries,
when the number of armed conflicts (those with 1,000 or more deaths per year)
diminishes by half, and when voter participation in most democracies exceeds
60% in most elections.
Regional Considerations
Africa: Democratization
has regressed over the past several years, with failed state policies, rampant
corruption, and ethnic tensions in Kenya, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo,
Somalia, and Zimbabwe. Freedom House rated 11 of the 48 countries in the region
“free,” while 15 regressed and 6 made improvements. The Charter on
Democracy, Elections and Governance adopted by the African Union in 2007 sets
democratic standards to be met by African governments and provides a framework
for assessing progress. The Pan African Parliament might get legislative power
in 2009.
Asia and Oceania:
Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Sri Lanka all saw
declines in their Freedom House ratings. China accounts for half of all those
living in “not free” countries and frequently blocks access to Web
sites such as YouTube and Wikipedia. Freedom House rates 16 of Asia’s 39
countries as “free,” 13 as “partly free,” and 10 “not
free.” Only 7% of the region’s population had access to free media
in 2007. ASEAN adopted a new Charter to foster integration and democracy. In the
Middle East, Israel remains the only country rated “free,” while 6
countries are “partly free” and 11 are rated “not free.”
The Arab League could play an important role in improving democracy in this region.
Political demonstrations in South Korea are increasingly conducted in cyberspace,
opening potentials for greater participatory democracy.
Europe: The EU is a champion of public
participation in policymaking. All 27 EU countries are rated “free.”
Currently 8 million illegal immigrants are estimated to be in the EU. New regulations
were adopted to strengthen and harmonize the legal system of migration and immigrants’
integration across the Union. Countries hoping to join the EU are working to develop
their democratic institutions and cultures. In some of the former Soviet Union
and Central and Eastern Europe (non-EU) countries, the tendency toward autocracy,
corruption, and lack of progressive institutions hinders the democratization process.
Russia has begun implementing its national plan against corruption.
Latin America: Latin America has the
highest level of inequality in the world, and organized crime, corruption, and
repression of civil liberties threaten many of its young democracies. Populist
governments promise to improve social justice along with economic growth. The
Union of South American Nations is intended to strengthen regional integration
and democracy. However, censorship, as well as violence and intimidation against
media by organized crime groups, are deteriorating the freedom of the press in
the region.
North America: Although established
democracies, Canada and the U.S. are faced with powerful lobbying, increased corruption,
freedom-restrictive regulations, and centralization of media. Yet having a woman
and an African-American in the 2008 Democratic Party presidential nomination race
is a historic moment for the U.S. and for world democracy. There are censorship
concerns over new Canadian legislation that allows the government constraints
over film and television productions deemed “contrary to public policy.”
Direct voting on issues via the Internet should be considered to augment representative
democracy.
Graph: Global
trends of freedom
Source: Freedom in the World 2008, Freedom House
You
are invited to participate in updating and improving this challenge. Please
click
here for
the online suvey form.
Millennium Project Homepage