Millennium Project
Global
Challenges
Facing Humanity
4.
Democratization
How can genuine
democracy emerge from authoritarian regimes?
Although there is no international consensus on how to measure democracy,
one composite definition is that democracy is a relationship between responsible
citizens and a responsive government that encourages participation in the political
process and guarantees basic rights. This kind of relationship has been increasing
and improving worldwide. According to Freedom House, the number of free countries
grew from 46 to 90 over the past 30 years, accounting for 46% of the world’s
population, and for the past several years 64% of countries have been electoral
democracies. Since democracies tend not to fight each other and since humanitarian
crises are far more likely under authoritarian regimes than democratic ones,
the trend toward democracy should lead to a more peaceful future.
While the number of partly free countries grew from 49 to 59, about 2.4 billion
people live in 45 countries with authoritarian regimes. About 5.4 billion people
do not have access to free media, and more than 80 journalists were killed in
2006. Nevertheless, the emergence from authoritarian to more democratic regimes
is being aided by the growth of civil society, media access for pro-democratic
actors, long-term economic stability, a focus on citizen participation, transparent
judicial systems, e-government with Internet access, increasing literacy, improved
quality of governance assessment systems, international interdependence, and
the development of a global consciousness. Although making development assistance
dependent on good governance has helped in some countries, genuine democracy
will be achieved when the people—not external actors—demand government
accountability. International protocols are needed to assist failed states or
regions within states, and intervention procedures are needed when a state constitutes
a significant threat to its citizens or others.
The World Bank’s governance indicators show correlations between a free
press, government transparency, and effectiveness, as well as between democratic
accountability and a less corrupt government. The Bank estimated that one standard
deviation improvement in governance results in a threefold increase of income
per capita. It also estimates that more than $1 trillion was paid in political
bribes in 2006, roughly equivalent to all military budgets combined. Despite
a decade of progress in establishing anti-corruption regulations, 71 countries
of 163 surveyed show rampant corruption. The World Bank’s new technical
assistance programs and the UN Convention Against Corruption are initial steps
to reverse increasing political bribery, as are the many ways the Internet is
increasing the opportunity for citizen feedback on public issues. Governments
are expected to become more accountable, transparent, and responsive to their
citizens. However, democratic e-government also requires e-access, which today
is unavailable to the majority of the world, although the success of the $100
laptop might rapidly change this in poorer countries.
The Internet allows self-organization around common ideals, independent of
conventional institutional controls, regardless of nationality or languages
to improve the future. Injustices in different parts of the world become the
concern of thousands or millions of people who then pressure local, regional,
or international governing systems to find solutions. This unparalleled social
power is reinventing citizens’ roles in the political process and changing
institutions, policymaking, and governance. However, the development of methods
to counter information manipulation, as well as increased freedom of information
transmission, will be important for continued democratic consolidation. Organized
crime, methods to tamper with election results, information warfare, and the
potential of individuals to make and use weapons of mass destruction are not
being addressed seriously enough today to ensure the future of democracy. It
is daunting to consider potential synergies among these threats to democracy,
but the sooner countermeasures are developed and implemented, the better.
Challenge 4 will be addressed seriously when strategies to address these threats
are in place, when less than 10% of the world lives in nondemocratic countries,
when the number of armed conflicts (those with 1,000 or more deaths per year)
diminishes by half, and when voter participation in most democracies exceeds
60% in most elections.
Regional Considerations
Africa: After several
years of democratic improvements, sub-Saharan Africa suffered more setbacks than
gains in 2006. Freedom House rated just 11 of the 48 countries in the region “free,”
22 “partly free,” and 15 “not free.” The Charter on Democracy,
Elections and Governance adopted by the African Union in 2007 sets democratic
standards to be met by African governments and provides a framework for judging
their success. More than 15 elections will be taking place across Africa in 2007.
There are proposals to create an African states union and to invest the Pan African
Parliament with legislative power.
Asia and Oceania:
India is the largest democracy in the world and elements of democracy are
emerging in China. Freedom House rates 16 of Asia’s 39 countries as “free”,
12 “partly free,” and 11 “not free.” Only 7% of the region’s
population had access to free media in 2006. ASEAN is preparing a new Charter
to foster integration and democracy (similar to the EU). Many countries in the
Middle East have made some progress on women’s right to vote and hold office,
although Israel remains the only country rated “free” in the Middle
East, with 6 “partly free” and 11 “not free.”
Europe: The EU is a champion of public
participation in policymaking. All 27 EU countries are rated “free,”
with the newest members––Romania and Bulgaria––still having
to upgrade in press freedom. Currently 7 million illegal immigrants are estimated
to be in the EU, with an additional 500,000 arriving each year. New regulations
are intended to strengthen the legal system for international migration and immigrants’
integration. Of the former Soviet Union and Central and Eastern Europe (non-EU)
countries, 4 are rated “free,” 8 “partly free,” and 7
“not free.” In some of these countries, the tendency toward autocracy,
corruption, and lack of progressive institutions hinder the democratization process.
Latin America: Latin America has the
highest level of inequality in the world, and many countries face corruption and
few civil liberties. Yet there were many competitive and fair elections in 2006.
Since free-market democracies have not made sufficient progress toward social
justice and equity, new and increasingly autocratic populist leaders have received
support and are increasing the nationalization of industry. A stronger integration
of the region’s countries could help consolidate democracy (as it has done
in the EU), improve trade, and fight corruption and autocracies.
North America: National Security Presidential
Directive 51 and the Patriot Act have raised concerns about the future health
of democracy in the U.S., as have powerful lobbies, increased corruption, and
centralization of media. Yet the region’s economic and political freedoms
attract immigrants from around the world. Canada is still lacking democratic reforms,
especially with an unelected senate and the poor representation of women and minorities
in Parliament. Direct voting via the Internet versus representative democracy
is being discussed.
Graph: Global
Trends in Freedom
Source: Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2007
You
are invited to participate in updating and improving this challenge. Please
click
here for
the online suvey form.
Millennium Project Homepage